Kasz216 said:
It sounds like it's a government entity that's going "rogue" for all intensive purposes. |
Sorry to be a pedant, but the phrase is "all intents and purposes." Just thought you might like to know.
On topic, there are compelling arguments both for and against state regulation of net neutrality. I agree with you, it really does sound like the FCC is charging ahead without paying due attention to all the stakeholders involved, here. I suspect it has more to do with lobbyists from major ISPs than it does the White House.
"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.
