Fox News tops source of voter misinformation

[whatever]

Kasz216 said:

GameOver22 said:

Kasz216 said:

They were chemical weapons with the abiltity to cause serious bodily injury to a significant number of people.

That's specifically what they found.

Rereading the article, I don't see anything that makes that claim. The article is very vague, and when it does mention the quantity of weapons found, it hardly seems enough to cause mass casualties. Even if the article does show that there were WMDs in Iraq though, this does not show that WMDs were possessed and capable of use by the government- this is really the more relevant question and probably the better question to ask in a poll.

Edit: Quite a few of the links in the article don't even work, at least for me.

It's poisoous gas canisers... there is no such thing as a percise poison gas canister.

Considering that for months before the invasion of Iraq, all we heard about and saw were mushroom clouds and an emminent nuclear attack from Iraq giving nukes to Al Quaeda, this hardly qualifies as the WMD used to justify the war.  I have fertilizer in my garage, I guess I have WMD also.