Kasz216 said:
And that that scientist claims a dozen reasons why your study is wrong (even though it isn't) and ignores progress until he dies or retires. People have an idealized view of science... but the truth is, very rarely is a new truth aloud to live until the old guard "Dies out". In political sociences... oh boy, it's worse. |
If you can prove your position with a reproducible experiment or mathematics then it doesn't matter how stubborn the "old guard" is. Especially in todays age where each paper is put through a peer review of many researchers before publication. There is no way a single person could stop a paper from being published.
Also just because someone publishes a controversial paper doesn't mean everyone in their field is supposed to automatically accept their view. It is natural for there to be hesitance to ideas that change established thought. After sufficient evidence is brought forward that hesitance dissolves away and becomes a thing of the past.
Do you have any examples of such a thing occurring in the last 30 or 40 years.
The definitive evidence that video games turn people into mass murderers








