Vetteman94 said:
FreeTalkLive said:
Vetteman94 said:
FreeTalkLive said:
Vetteman94 said:
FreeTalkLive said:
Galaki said:
of the Republican party?
|
Senate Filibusters are almost always good. The less amount of time the US Senate is in session, the better as it usually does bad things. So this is great news.
Thank you Mitch for talking about your friend instead of voting to increases taxes and spending with that time. Mitch usually does the wrong thing while in office but in this case, he did all of the people of the US a good service.
Thank you Jon for discourging the Senate from meeting that week. The less the US Senate does, the better it is for everyone.
|
Please tell me you are kidding?
|
About what? Congress goes to DC and spends other people's money worse than the people would have spent it. Almost everything Congress does is bad. The less Congress meets, the better it is for everyone. I think this is the popular opinion of the people in the US. People certainly feel this way in New Hampshire, the Live Free or Die state. Where do you live?
|
But how would this have cost us any money
|
That's all that Congress does. They sit in a room and find new things to spend money on.
|
This wouldn't have cost the taxpayers a dime, the money would be gotten from closing a business tax loophole. So what was the problem with letting this happen
|
There isn't a business tax loophole. That is just a way of saying that some people want to increase taxes. They want to increase taxes on companies so that people don't have to pay it. However, if taxes are increased on companies, those increases will be passed on to the people that use those products. So it is a tax increase and it does cost the people money.
