MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Kasz216 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Kasz216 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Kasz216 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
no suprise there
|
I also like how everbody is jumping into the thread with preconceived notions without even bothering to look at the study and realize what a farse it is.
This is actually the kind of stuff that makes it so news orginizations can mislead you in the first place.
That's why I try to never trust a report until I can see and study the underlying methods first.
|
dito
|
So you actually looked at the study and agreed with the methods? How could you not see how incredibly biased it was.
Show me one question there, that you think a left leaning person is more likely to get wrong then a right leaning person... who watches no news at all.
|
i have a short term memory problem. do you really want me to read it again?
|
So you don't agree with a study until you read it's methods and then completely forget what those methods are?
|
yes and yes
im sure nobody remebers a i thread i made a while back(that got locked cause it was in the wrong forum) about kids and race.
it asked kids in the servey simple questions like: which kid is the bad kid asking kids to point to drawings of kid like characters of different colors with some of the kids verbally answering all races are equal, (and not really nowing the survey was about race) while more then 50%(ball park cause of my memory) of kids of all races taking the survey pointing to the darker colors.
and i told you the method
|
What? You didn't mention the methods of this study once, except that you think you read them.
