| Gnizmo said:
I'm saying very little? Based on your own description of what is happening with "people chasing their own tails", how am I a safe bet. You contradict yourself, Gnizmo. To address your post though I am not defending anyone. I am pointing out we have nothing to go on. NO. You completely ignore what I just pointed out. Stefl made a list of peopel who haven't yet posted, and your first reaction was to insult the people who were talking. You made no attempt to say something like, "maybe they haven't had the time yet", or "maybe they haven't noticed anything worth commenting on". No. Your post was aggressive, and, frankly, unecessary. They didn't need your defense, nor was stefl's post anything worth that response. You dodge the issue now too. I asked you why you quoted stefl and defended those players behaviors. WHICH YOU DID. "I am not defending anyone" is a lie. You are not merely "pointing out that 'we' have nothing to go on", your post was demeaning (even if it was not meant to be), and you were ACTIVELY DEFENDING those players. Currently people are using statements of how many mafia members we have as a means to find who is scum. That has to be the least useful metric ever. Admittedly Hatmoza managed to make a somewhat interesting point with it, but on its own is entirely irrelevant. There is nothing to work with though, and people are trying to make that nothing into something. That is chasing your own tail. So your "chasing your own tail" comment refers to the number of players discussion? Interesting. So you responded to Stefl, explaining that people don't have to be posting because there was an argument about how many players there are. More interesting, revenge voting is typically only something to do if you are mafia. I will stick with my vote consequently. I'm not voting for you because you're voting for me. I even said your vote was fine. It could have been anyone. Your suspicion is based on the post itself. @j0 |
