Time Magazine proves its biased; doesnt name Julian Assange POTY2010

[Kasz216]

twesterm said:

ssj12 said:

Munkeh111 said:

I would also like to point out that Assange has only really turned up in the last few weeks, so a bit late for the awards. And it is NOT a popularity contest

its not a popularity content, its about impact.  Mark Zuckerberg by far truly had no impact on the web for reasons I stated in this thread. Assange, and several others, had bigger impact.

I'm sorry for only skimming this thread, but according to your opening post it is a popularity contest... :-p

That is the funny thing isn't it?  I mean I woudln't give it to facebook either, what with Twitter surpassing it, but hey.  Facebook has been more impactful then Assange... who's leaks haven't really accomplished much yet except a couple people getting fired.