Time Magazine proves its biased; doesnt name Julian Assange POTY2010

[Mr Khan]

ssj12 said:

Kasz216 said:

Also, you are saying Osama Bin Laden should of one SSJ?

Seriously?

Yes, because he one of the people who had one of the biggest impacts in USA history. The article would have put the USA in bad light though, due to the fact it would have had to go into detail about the fact we gave him money and weapons to take over the region his Taliban soldiers occupy.  Then again, we could have also had Saddam too since he was also put into power by our government.

Maybe the USA needs to stop giving control of governments, money, and weapons to people outside this country? We cause our own problems.

As far as i know, we supported the Mujehadin (sp?), and not the Taliban who emerged in the civil war after the Soviet withdrawal. Bin Laden also supported the Mujehadin, but stopped caring about Afghanistan after the Soviet withdrawal as well. He only returned there because the Sudan would not give him asylum, while the Taliban was willing to, even though the Taliban were the ones who had pushed out his old allies (who have been our allies again in the Northern Alliance)