Time Magazine proves its biased; doesnt name Julian Assange POTY2010

[scottie]

MrBubbles said:

Doobie_wop said:

MrBubbles said:

there is no journalism in mass releasing stolen, irrelevant, and unimportant diplomatic cables or dangerous files like shopping lists of targets for terrorists to attack and afghan informant identification (names and locations) .  perhaps if anything not garbage or disgusting was released he would have made it.   this guy is a pos molesterer and murderer.  TIME should not honour those sorts of people.  he is scum.

 

 

Edit:  MrBubbles person of the year is Commander Shephard.

Nothing you said made any sense.

I'd also like to point out that Stalin, Hitler and Ayatollah have been named Person of the Year. It's about impact, whether it's positive or negative should be irrelevant. Time just chickened out because they'd catch some flack from all the US businessman and politicians who have had their dirty laundry shown to the public.

if you cant understand it thats not my fault. 

 

and whats the problem with time realizing they shouldnt glorify trash?  poty should be someone that others should aspire to be like. 

I aspire to be more like Julian, a true hero.

 

Anyway, I'm pretty surprised by this, usually time don't shy away from a tough pick