Kasz216 said:
benao87 said:
Kasz216 said:
benao87 said:
Here are your sexual charges -.-
"The two Swedish women who accuse WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange of sexual misconduct were at first not seeking to bring charges against him. They just wanted to track him down and persuade him to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases, according to several people in contact with his entourage at the time." -Reuters-
|
Just because you don't want to charge someone for a crime doesn't mean the state won't charge someone for a crime. If you assault someone in an alleyway and they turn out to be a sadomaschist and not mind... you still committed a crime... and chances are the police will still prosecute you.
Just because a victim doesn't want to press charges doesn't mean the state won't. Which is why all the "CIA conspiracy and she works with them" stuff always made me laugh... as did the "They want to get back at him! wild accusatsions" when all evidence pointed to the fact that they reported what happened not even sure it counted as a crime.
People are just making up wild and outlandish stories because they want to protect the guy because he's famous.
When they should let him just go to court, likely be cleared of the rape charges even though what he's accused of is rape and there doesn't seem to be much arguement about the situation, and let the whole thing go.
|
Could you please confirm me if you read the whole article. Thanks.
|
Yes. Why?
I even read the last part where they mention he intentionally left the country when he knew the police wanted to question him.
Whole thing makes you wonder if they got infected with a disease... but that's just baseless speculation
|
The thing is that you clearly want this guy to go to jail. For what crime I ask? Rape? They had to drop charges on rape, and when they re-opened the case, they had to look for another crime less strong.
The thing is, you and me give our opinion based on assumptions, there are no facts. All the information is based on the declaration of either the entourage of Assange, or the two girls. Then, if one girl didn't want to charge him, until what point did he really commited a crime. I'm not defending the guy, one possibility is that he indeed commited a crime. But, I also take into account the possibility that the guy didn't commited any crime at all.
The only facts are that, they once dropped the case, and then re-opened. And the guy is a pain for the US government. You beleive in the system, so you hope that justice will prevail. Me?, well my opinion of the US government is not that good.
Btw, sorry for the late reply, I was doing a paper for the uni, and I felt that i had to reply this.
