DonFerrari on 15 December 2010
lestatdark said:
DonFerrari said:
lestatdark said:
DonFerrari said:
lestatdark said:
goforgold said:
and what I find funny is how they praise things most reviews bashed.
the menus for example, straight forward, no confusion everything at all, yet almost every other reviewer "but but teh menus are too complicated, bad menus blah blah blah"
even the crash sounds.
they could give this game a 6/10 and will agree whole heartedly
this will be 1 in the 1% of GT5 reviews that will be actually creditable in my opinion.
next part they said will be out sometime next year, wow
|
Yup, that's why I loved their punchline in the end. Really put to light all the bad professionalism that most reviews had.
Next part will probably be when they unlock everything, meaning they'll have to reach level 40 in both A-Spec and B-Spec to unlock Nurburgring 24H endurance.
|
Anyone that played GT in any of the iterations knows that it's impossible to judge how good it's without some 1000 hours of love =]
|
You're completely right, since that's about the time that it took me to get 100% in GT4 xD. That's one of the things I love about GT games, the amount of content they put out is staggering.
Even GT3 (the less content filled GT game), lasted me for some good couple of hundred hours before putting it down.
|
Doing a SP count experience.... GT4 1000 hours for 40 bucks (or GT5 probably 1500 hours for 60 bucks) 4 cents for hour
For a Shooter Like Halo, GoW or KZ... 6~8h for 60 bucks.... 10 dolars for hour of game...
Which has the best cost-benefit for you?
|
That's why my two favourite and most played genres are both RPG's and Simulators. Those are the two best cost-benefit genres out there.
|
I'm guilty of both... altough I still love action/plataformer and fighting games =] we must mix everything a little...
Even I get a little dozzled after 40h playing GT5 in a weekend.
