Oh, and another argument I just remembered. Evolution, if true, clearly relies on improbable events occuring repeatedly over and over again, as it's never been documented in action in the few thousand years of recored history. The second law of thermodynamics and laws of statistical probability aren't exclusive to their fields. Scientists just like to suppress them. Everything in the world gravitates towards equilibrium and states of higher probability, a direct counterpoint to evolution, which relies on constant gravitation towards the improbable. Cars break, glaciers melt, deserts grow, crops die, but somehow fish sprout legs and walk. Please if anyone has a good response to this I'm trying to be rational here. I'm not the religious nut a lot of Atheists think I am. Why else would I rely on pascal's wager for my faith?
I'm not a fanboy, I just don't enjoy dual analog control. It's d-pad or wii-mote for me.
the conduit has changed the way wii play games. 
I know. I'm sick of the puns too.
