By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Strategyking92 said:
noname2200 said:
Strategyking92 said:


I figured as much. Obsidian might cut corners when it comes to developing, but Beshesda doesn't.

???

Have you ever played a Bethesda game?  Obsidian's not exactly known for QA, but Bethesda's games are also buggy as all hell.

"Eurogamer gave the game a 7/10, but criticized its lack of polish." -Alpha Protocol

"Within hours of the game's release, players of Fallout: New Vegas began reporting a variety of technical issues (game-saves becoming corrupted, the game freezing, players becoming stuck within the terrain, forcing them to restart the game from scratch)."- New Vegas

"(it got good reviews)However, the game was criticized for being incomplete due to a rushed deadline" -KOTOR 2

 

Now I know bugs exist in Bethesda games (believe me.. I know..) But I have never played one that has been considered incomplete, had multiple game breaking bugs (I had 4 of them in obsidian's new vegas) Or where the beggining is so slow. In fact, I rmember KOTOR 2 and New vegas having a very similar slow beggining where I was naked because I couldn't find any good armor worth using.. Pretty much, Bethesda consistently delivers fun games. Odsidian delivers.. Buggier & worse sequels.

What I'm saying is that they ain't even in the same league.

with WRPG"S that big in size,how could you not have bugs. All I know in fall out new vegas,my game froze on me twice and I got caught in a wall and had to restart the game,but I did'nt mind because personally new vegas is just that good to me. lol