By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 11 December 2010
Edit Thread
Badassbab said:
Kasz216 said:

Also, you know... you're wrong on that too.

There is world opinon polls that state "Should there be an attack on Iran" in which it is answered now.

If you phrase the question "If negotiations fail to get Iran to stop it's nuclear plans should there be an attack".


The answer is yes.  Most people trust in the negotiations.

The majority of EU states population agree to an attack.

Really?

http://www.thechicagocouncil.org/UserFiles/File/POS_Topline Reports/POS 2010/Global Views 2010.pdf

Iran did agree to a fuel swap deal with Brazil and Turkey but the US would have none of it. Iran is a signatory to NPT. Countries which are not (Israel, North Korea, India and Pakistan) all became nuclear powers.

Did you bother to figure out WHY they US refused it?  I'm guessing not?

It's because it didn't actually cover all the Nuclear Enrichman Iran was already doing that they were going to keep onto... for no apparent reason since it's useless. (Nuclear weapons testing)