sapphi_snake said:
Stefan.De.Machtige said:
Kasz216 said:
Not really. I mean, unless you are going to activily gentically alter people for superior genes and take out hereditary diseases and the like...
having two gay people have a biological son isn't actually useful for mankind.
Great for the indvidual parents sure, but it holds no actual benefit for mankind since the genetics of two people are going to be random, and when you consider the losing out on adoption and overpopulation you could argue that on a larger sense it'd be damaging.
It's the same with surogacy for infertile straight couples. Really it'd be great if we could move away from a culture that suggests that you NEED to have a child who has your DNA.
|
That's in our blood. We feel closer to a true blood relative. Lots of studies have proven this. Evolution-wise it does make a lot of sense.
|
Actually it's nothing more than cultural indoctrination.
|
Actually its called evolution and has been the driving force for all life for the last couple billion years. It has nothing to do with cultural indoctrination and everything to do with how our brains have been programmed through evolution to perceive those that are your close relatives. Evolution makes us to try to pass on as many genes of ourselves as we can.
