SamuelRSmith said:
I don't actually think the royal family are allowed to pass actual comment on any Government policy - so we shouldn't technically know if he's for or against (I know this is true of the monarch, I'm not sure if it extends to other members). Here's an idea... why don't we just get rid of the royal family in its entirety? Buckingham Palace is essentially the world's largest council house, anyway. And we'd also save money in other areas (for example, when the Government wants to erect wind turbines, they have to pay money to the Royals for the right to use the land.) |
I'd definitly do a cost/benefit analysis on them.
They do help tourism though and are pretty useful as "useless" heads of State. Can send them to events you don't want to send real politicians too. Most countries are more excited and lean towards Britain if the Queen shows up then if Cameron shows up.
They might actually more then make up their fees all things combined. Worth looking in to for sure though.








