Mr Khan said:
Not even matters of "being behind" technically. You're not going to let Nintendo and Microsoft define the terms of the new console game for two to five years while you're still sitting around with the PS3. PlayStation Move won't make the PS3 live that long in the face of new competitors, quite frankly nothing would, and i'm not directing that just at Sony or Microsoft supporters, it's just a bad idea in the video game market to let the competition launch before you, unless they launch altogether too early (3DO, Jaguar, Saturn, Dreamcast), but Microsoft and Nintendo learned a bitter lesson from launching a year after the PS2, and Sony really took a beating from being a year behind the 360, and that's 1 year. Now they're going to give the competition two to five whole years? No. |
The PS3 didn't take a beating for releasing a year late. It took a beating because of the high price, lack of good games (compared to other systems), and difficulty to develop for.
