Profcrab said:
Oh, they look good. I don't mind the games that are running at lower resolutions and are upscaled. I'm sure Crysis will look good also on either the PS3 or 360. They don't reduce the graphic quality much, they just reduce the resolution. Crysis won't be quite the same though, that game is making bitches out of PCs that people thought were fast before. |
Yeah, but like i said in another post, that was the same when Doom 3 came out. I remember back then i was a very big PC gamer, barely played on consoles, always upgrading a part or 2 at least every couple of months, if not more for my computer. Never had a problem with any games coming out, always matched or exceeded the recommended requirement of any new game coming out at the time. When Doom 3 came out, my computer barely met the minimum requirements, i was like "what the hell?!?". But eventually that game was ported over to the original Xbox, and from what i heard, it was actually a pretty good port, even adding co op i think.
I think its possible to do a fairly decent port of Crysis to consoles. One thing people have to remember is that the requirements to run a game on a PC would actually be higher then having to run them on a console for the main reason is that a console is a dedicated system (mostly) while a PC has to eat up some of the resources for the OS (hence the reason some new games have higher requirements if your running Vista compared to XP, cuz as we know, Vista is a resource hog from hell) and anything else that may be running to keep the game running.
