Rainbird said:
dahuman said:
Rainbird said:
dahuman said:
If they make it really user friendly then I'll think about it, as long as they don't stray away from the point of it being a phone first.
|
User friendliness is exactly what they've aimed with WP7, and it's what I like so much about it. It's all about making your interactions with the phone easy and natural. 
|
off topic but,
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/microsofts-windows-phone-7-code-limitation-puts-an-end-to-mobile-firefox/7785
tbh, I think my next phone will be Android if anything, unless something else better comes along. iPhone works wonders after you jailbreak it, but Apple is still being dicks about flash which is the ONLY problem it has after you hack it. WP7 is another example of closed platform that's going to fuck me over one way or another. Though I'm sure most users won't even notice the difference since the percentage of power users vs regular consumers is very big.
|
I'd rather have security anyway, hopefully it doesn't turn developers off too much.
|
uh, no windows platform has ever been secure in any form or fashion, Macs are not secure, nor is anything else on the planet. Windows is a bottom feeder when it comes to security. If you really want something more secure then just go without a smart phone then not much could put your phone into a security risk. It all depends on how much flexibility you want with a smart phone, if you are just at a regular consumer level, then any smart phone is good, and WP7 has Live so if you have a 360 then I can totally see it being worthwhile if that's the primary aim.
