You know, I don't normally find myself meeting in mind or agreeing entirely with the required vocational stratagem to label myself an atheist. I mean I'm most definitely not a monotheist but there are certain specifics of an atheist that negates me from fitting into that category either.
For example what would make an Atheist not a Mono or Ditheist is because they do not believe in any form of intelligent design. Yet they will allow for reasonable and testable hypothesis and theory. For the sake of example and perhaps its necessity I'll observe the arguments from both sides regarding the big bang:
A Monotheist will associate the big bang to going back to the point of not knowing how, to be clear on this aspect I'll say that science to a point has back tracked the big bang theory far enough in time to believe in its conclusive arguing point; while still in theory that the universe was nothing and that infinite mass with zero volume suddenly erupted. A monotheist however will ask, well "what made this mass" the deliberate nature of the question is from a belief that all things follow back to the algorithm of a god’s hand designing something with an intention and perhaps purpose. However pressed further a Monotheist will not apply the same line of logic to the creation of a god or whatever the bull is because god cannot be created and so they shoot themselves in the foot with their own argument.
Yet an Atheist will argue the material fact and also (the important part) the testable or tested theory. This is where I do not fit the bill. I can accept measurement but only measurement based on a preexisting value, such as there are 5 million people in NYC and 20% of them are left handed. Such a statistic and all interpretations and elaborations are fine but I cannot agree with evolutionary sciences that cannot be proven here and now, even if the theory is very sound.
I'm Unamerica and you can too.
The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread:
