richardhutnik said:
Obama's desire to do politics differently, and not have a hostile partisan environment, right when the GOP is setting itself up to make Obama fail and become one-term, is what might of happened. Obama isn't confronting anyone on anything here. He could of just pushed the middle class tax cuts extension only and have the GOP voted it down, but he didn't. He compromised, and the Democrats in congress felt left in the wind. So, they may decide to play hardball here. I think there is also something where the GOP will still try to stonewall anything else the Democrats want, even if the Democrats felt that dealing with the tax issue would hold things up. One thing that may be of concern is Obama talking about you caving into people who hold people hostage, if they start killing the hostages. That is not a good thing to have happen. As for myself, pardon me for not caring about any unemployment extensions. I am currently not getting any at this point, so I don't care what they do. And yes, I am out of work. I am looking to see if I can piece together some additional money somewhere and also food stamp benefits to get more food. |
Shouldn't unemployment extensions get you back on unemployment? I mean, I guess it doesn't work that way cause you'd be happier if you did, I dunno, despite being out of work i'm not on it either. Didn't aquire citizenship in the state i'm living in now yet. I swore I knew someone who was getting unemployment from oregon who had a breach in his coverage until a new extension came through.
I mean, I expect democrats and republicans to stonewall each other, what I don't get is democrats stonewalling something thats 85% what they want, 15% what republicans want and something they pretty much loudly proclaimed was something that was political death to stonewall. (Middle class tax cuts.)








