By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Eomund said:
This thread isn't simply a Pro-FairTax only thread. I want the detractors to factually attack it so they can be set straight....

You should probably avoid telling everyone that you're right and they're wrong right off the bat if you want to foster an open discussion.

Also, I know this was brought up already (sorry for coming to the thread late) but the 23%/30% thing is really important. When you tell someone that a tax is 23%, they assume that a $1.00 item now costs $1.23, when it would actually cost $1.30 (because 30 cents is 23% of $1.30). Yes, it's an inclusive tax, and we get that, and it doesn't matter, because misleading is misleading no matter how technically correct it may be. The Fairtax is a 30% sales tax.

I'm in favor of a consumption tax, btw. I don't like all this "prebate" stuff, I think that we should instead just not charge the consumption tax on basic needs like food, clothing, the first $20,000 of your first car's value, the first $X of your home's value or the first $Y of your rent each month, etc.

As far as the issue of spending decreasing because of people saving more money, this is not such a big problem, but it is the reason that we need a transitional period. Two things are going to happen simultaneously: Prices will go up, and paychecks will go up. Consumers might have "sticker shock" for a few seconds until they realize that they're also making a lot more money. Yes, savings will be encouraged even after the "sticker shock" wears off, but this is not a bad thing. When people have more money saved, they will spend more money because they will be more financially secure. A good average credit rating is good for the economy, not bad.

 

EDIT: Ah, used goods!  I knew I was forgetting something.  I would think used goods that are sold back from a reseller would still have the Fairtax applied.  But you wouldn't need to pay a tax at a garage sale or anywhere that you don't need a business license.