Bobbuffalo said:
That's not atheism. Atheism is simply that you won't believe blindly in something unless there are proofs. If there are proofs that God exists then I'll accept it because there's a proof of it. But so far there isn't and no religion has proved it yet. |
That is way too broad of a definition for atheism. I can think of a number of theologians who would qualify as atheists under that definition. That definition is closer to applying to something like rationality, but atheists do not have a monopoly on rationality.