Lostplanet22 said:
Kasz216 said:
Lostplanet22 said:
Kasz216 said:
Lostplanet22 said:
Kasz216 said:
Lostplanet22 said:
Kasz216 said:
Lostplanet22 said:
Worst case: he stays in UK until 14th December...Then he will send to Sweden where he eventually get deported to the USA where he may get the Death Penalty...
You would still turn yourself in?
And you are saying what I said before....Considering how impossible it is to prove rape;..it is also impossible to prove their was no rape...and the easiest way to find someone..
It is all fishy
The facebook page that got deleted, his name dissapearing on the Times most important people of 2010 list...
Lucky their are people going on with Wikileaks...but also scary considering the 256 password code can be give any moment to the whole world..And then all wikileaks documents will be leaked..Even the ones Assange didn't want to leak because they were to extreme..
|
Yes? Because there is no actual way that would happen. Under what would he get the death penalty in America?
The "We don't like you so die act of 1956"?
Getting sent to America would literally be the BEST case scenario for him. You conspiracy theorists are missing the important part in that, it makes no logical sense for this to be a conspiracy... in anwyay, because the suspected goverments do nothing but LOSE by this happening.
It's "9/11 was an inside job" all over again.
|
That's why politician(s) say on national television that he should get killed? Thx to people saying stuff like he should be killed the suspecting goverment are already losing a lot...
|
Which, is kind of the point?
The whole point of a conspiracy theory is "IT'S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE OBVIOUS".
You don't embark on a giant conspiracy theory to kill someone, while simaltaniously saying "THIS GUY SHOULD BE KILLED".
And you certaintly don't do it right in the middle of a big shitstorm. You do it after things have died down... and even then, you just get someone to shoot him.
Seriously, tell me an endgame with this rape charge that in any way helps the US government.
|
Not only the US government;..But what are many hoping and I am not making this up that this would be the end of Wikileaks;.
Why is their an General/commanding Officer in Afghanistan saying this is good news? It is good news because that would bring justice for the swedisch girls;.or good news because he thinks this is/will be the end of Wikileaks? The sources of Assenge are probably shitting bricks......'What if he mentions my name' and it also gives a message for the rest of wikileaks...
|
A) Are you suggesting he wouldn't be happy that an accused rapist has been arrested? Besides he's a general, what does he know?
B) The source of the leak was already caught. What makes you think they even deal with names in the era of the internet?
C) Mentions their names how and why exactly? Assuming there even are names.
D) Gives what message to the rest of Wikileaks? If you post information we'll completely botch a conspiracy against you and make you 10 times more famous? Yeah, great message there.
Your just blinded by the fact that he's famous and claiming a conspiracy where there is no credible or useful reason for their to be one.
|
A) No I am suggesting he is happy because it could bring down wikileaks...Sure he is happy for the girls aswell but I doubt that is the main reason he is happy about it :).
B) All sources are caught? C) Because they want to know how they could leak and who did it ...
D) It gives the message 'We have Assenge...And he could name some people... Like who are also working on wiki leaks and who they have met etc;....
|
A) If he thinks it can bring down Wikileaks, he's a moron... because it can't. So I'm more likely to go with A. I mean, he was clearly asked his opinion on that guy being arrested for rape. What was his response going to be other then "Great"? "That sucks because I enjoy rape?"
B) All the US ones.
C) We already know who did it and how. It was one lower ranking army serviceman who illegally downloaded all the files while having access to the system.
D) Everyone who works for Wikinks is public knowledge?
|
A) all I read was.....'This morning I heard Assenge got arrested and I am happy about it'....No word about Rape....In fact it is also no rape but molesting.. If it is translated right from Swedish..
B) Hmm ok would rather be news for me but ok..
C) It is not only about the ones leaked now, leaked before, and the ones who come after this big 250k documents..
D) No, but some are still anonymous...and prefer that way...Working/supporting for wikileaks is not always a positive thing...
|
A) You don't think a reporter asked him a question there?
B) Ok
C) The ones before were already caught, and if he's arrested, how is he going to give info about further leaks?
D) I'm pretty sure everyone who works for them actually is public... and if it isn't, i can gurantee the government does already know.
