Onibaka said:
Kasz216 said:
Onibaka said:
Kasz216 said:
Onibaka said:
The man needs to be killed. Citizens doesn't have rights to know what are the objectives of their State.
Wikileaks will not change anything....It's only one more proof that 80% of what they tell you is lie.
|
Killing him would just be... dumb.
It's like, the worst political play anyone could do.
Even if it stopped the flow of information... (which it wouldn't) people would assume the WORST like way worse then the government is likely engaged in.
Furthermore it'd make the guy a martyr for his cause and if anything probably increase outside hacking attempts to get info.
|
I was sarcasttic.
The worst is: There are a LOT people thinking the same way, that he needs to be killed. It's OK for corrupt politicians, but a person to think this....Maybe.....People want to take the blue pill and remain in Matrix.
|
Nah, I think people would be fine with the "good" leaks. Which there have been some... but for every few good leaks there have been there has been a bunch of worthless things that are basically the equivlent of mundane emails and a few dangerous things like the above mentioned terrorist locations.
That's why people are mad. (mostly.) It would be like if a Website said "we have proof your company is corrupt!" Then they post the proof your company is corrupt, along with all of your personal emails about what you think about your co-workers and a file with your social secruity number, address, phone number, bank account you get paid into and yearly salary.
What the fuck is with posting all that other stuff?
Replace financial and personal problems caused with diplomatic and possible outright deaths through terrorists... and yeah... I can see people being mad enough that in the heat of the moment they'd call for someones death.
|
Who are the Terrorists?
|
Anyone who'd want to make a terrorist attack on the US with an internet connection? Those lists give some pretty unconventional "soft" targets.
