By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 06 December 2010
Edit Thread
shio said:
Kasz216 said:

Switzerland would make sense too... what with it's achieving Universal sufferage for women in 1990.

For someone who's supposed to be all about honesty and free spread of information and wanting politicians to stand for their crimes...  he sure seems to be running pretty hard from a crime he says he didn't do.

Dude seems seriously paranoid.  I think he should hand over the website to the other founders.  I noticed his lawyer said they noted how people as "High up in the Us as Sara Palin has called for his assassanation."

So... as high up as a reality TV show star who has less of a chance of being elected president then Snooki.  I mean she's not in government.


Not sure Swiss Asylum will work, what with their funds being frozen by the Swiss.

So having sex with a condom is a crime to run from?! After all, it's not like the swedish government is filled with liars and US-led idiots....

Assange and Assange's lawyer has agreed several times to to talk and meet with the people in charge of the case, yet the swedish guys have always declined.

Because the police should really question suspected rapists on the suspected rapists plan.  If he agreed to talk and meet with them... he would.   There is literally no change in doing so now then there would of been back then.  My guess is he wanted to conduct a phone interview, or have the police come to him.  Which would be a no, no obviously.  They wouldn't have a warrant out unless he wouldn't go to him.   He could literally not have a warrant out if he went to them.

As for the charges, you don't know what they are.  You are just believing his once and probably soon to be again Swedish lawyer on that being the charge.  The offical charge reads "Rape, Molestation and unlawful coercian."

What point would the US even have in getting the swiss to pursue him?  So he could be sent to the US and be cleared of all charges while simlataniously making the US government look 100 times worse for orchestrating the whole thing in the first place?

I don't think Obama is that dumb.  Or are you buying the "it's to assassnate him" line... which would...

A. Be the worst and most obvious assassnation ever.

B. Be completely useless because there are a lot of other people who own wikileaks.

C. Be even more completely useless because well... it's not like it'd be that hard for someone else to make their own wikileaks site.