richardhutnik said:
Well, it was kinda hard to come off as nice originally when I was probing with a speculative question, with "off the top of my head" and picking out the flagship reasons. This apparently didn't fit the Playstation brand. My question was a bit of an outside to near religious devotion I have seen towards the brand I didn't get why. I understood others, but not this one. Sony is a late comer, but took over for awhile. I just didn't get the devotion to the brand and asked why. For me, the Playstation brand became dominant, so I bought stuff for it. I did this while watching Sega go under, a brand I happened to like. So, the question is what lies at the heart of the devotion to the brand that some have, that I didn't get. Mascots are merely shortcuts to the answer in question, but don't fully fit. In regards to this, the only bit of bluntess I was personally offended by is people telling me to take the Playstation signature at the bottom (supposed to be next to the XBox one) as if it is some sort of badge of devotion someone is supposed to be fit to wear or not. I have them in the signature, because I thought it was a way to show people what I am playing without needing to update it. And yes, it shows Ratchet, whom I like as a character. |
The tag question is just because if it doesn't show trophies it's really possible that you don't play so it could be a "fake" that you know a lot of people use here when say that they aren't biassed because they have all 3 system, but don't know a game that isn't hated or with great advertisiment...
And i see your point, VG shouldn't bring loyalty as religion... but people like to attach to things... and about later comers, M$ came later, and Sega lived less than PS and still have a lot of fans even today after being dead for almost 10 years (at least console-wiser, altought i still love my Genesis, play Sega games and always cared more for Sonic than Mario - i can't understand someone liking to play 20 games with the same guy each Gen.... it was like up to Wii to a game sell on Nintendo system it should be Mario's something - unless it were Zelda or some other quality games) and i thrill for speed not pasta...
But I think everybody said right, the diversity is what catter to us.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







