By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:


Why not?  Seriously.   You are forcing someone to have sex against their will via deception.

What else would you call that?

Those women were not forced against their will to have sex with anyone. They consented, and even the prosecuttors admitted taht they're clients consented to having sex with him.

In one case the condom broke (this happens sometimes, and only a paranoid person would think he broke it on purpose).

On the other case the woman asked he wear a condom, and he did, The following morning they woke up, and had a little morning sex. BOTH THE MAN AND THE WOMAN FORGOT ABOUT THE CONDOM.

I see no rape having taken place.

Sorry, I can't continue this conversation. You are the most deluded irrational person I've met in my life (or at least with whom I talked to today). It's tiring having to reapeat myself over and over while you refuse to listen, keep making stuff up and using faulty comparisons.

As I said previously, may you meet and hook up with many women like these two throughtout your life. Goodbye sir!

 

Except... the prosecutors didn't admit that... at all.  That was Laywer PR spin. 

You are taking your full basis of information from HIS LAYWERS STORY and ignoring everything that contradicts it.

You keep repeating everything i've disproven... and close your ears to basic logical truths.

The New York Times today quoted accounts given by the women to police and friends as saying Assange "did not comply with her appeals to stop when (the condom) was no longer in use."

 

I'm not the delusional one here... one day you'll realize it.

The fact that you could find now flaw in the above 4 point statement proves it.