| sapphi_snake said: @Kasz216: It's not radical feminism. It's common sense. You have no commond sense whatsoever. If someone says "I want to have sex, but only if you use a condom" and you don't use a condom or intentionall break a condom for more pleasure you are commiting rape. You are specifically committing an act that not only was not consented too... you were specifically told was out of bounds. Proof that he broke the condom? And in the second case he wore a condom when she asked him to. He didn't wear one the next morning when not only did he probably forget about it, but the woman forgot to remind him or check if he was wearing one in the first place. The fact that a conviently lucky broken condom, was followed 3 days later by the non-use of a condom even when it was told that was needed is definitly a pattern that involved looking into. No it's not. You're more deluded than those conspiracy theorists. Furthermore he was fine with standing trial, but has suddenly changed his mind... because maybe he realizes he's actually guilty? Maybe because under the Swedesh legal system the woman need no actual evidence other than they're testimony in order to get him convicted? |
Why not? Seriously. You are forcing someone to have sex against their will via deception.
What else would you call that?
Seriously, which of these very simple and logical points do you not understand?
1) Sex without consent = rape.
2) Saying you will only have sex with a condom = Consenting to have sex, only with a condom. True or False?
3) Not wearing a condom while saying you were going to, or intentionally damaging it = Not having sex the way that was consented via your actions.
4) Sex withotu consent = Rape.
