@Kasz216:
It's not radical feminism. It's common sense.
You have no commond sense whatsoever.
If someone says "I want to have sex, but only if you use a condom" and you don't use a condom or intentionall break a condom for more pleasure you are commiting rape.
You are specifically committing an act that not only was not consented too... you were specifically told was out of bounds.
Proof that he broke the condom? And in the second case he wore a condom when she asked him to. He didn't wear one the next morning when not only did he probably forget about it, but the woman forgot to remind him or check if he was wearing one in the first place.
The fact that a conviently lucky broken condom, was followed 3 days later by the non-use of a condom even when it was told that was needed is definitly a pattern that involved looking into.
No it's not. You're more deluded than those conspiracy theorists.
Furthermore he was fine with standing trial, but has suddenly changed his mind... because maybe he realizes he's actually guilty?
Maybe because under the Swedesh legal system the woman need no actual evidence other than they're testimony in order to get him convicted?
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)
