| binary solo said: Not a big sample size but I've seen comment in a few places (not here though) from PS2 fans who lament the lack of b/c in PS3 and as a consequence are not buying PS3 at $299 / the equivalent price in their country. Question is, how big is that group of PS2 fans, will they ever buy a non-b/c PS3 and if so at what price? I'm thinking there's a substantial number of people in that group, I think they aren't going to buy until PS3 is down to $199, but they will buy non-b/c PS3 at that price. But I also think if Sony wanted to they could introduce a b/c sku at $299 when next they drop the price of the basic PS3 and sell a lot of consoles. Theres' got to be a strategy to get that demographic into the current generation. But what's the best way? They need to be brought over to PS3 if the 10-year plan is going to be a reality for PS3. |
Here is even more expensive, at 650 US$ or more (1200 reais in legal stores)
And even tough the lack o b/c i still bought a PS3, I have a PS2 for those games... But nevermind I agree that a price cut or new SKU with b/c (even tought it's useless for me, and most gamers in 5 year of PS3) would bring alot of new customers that used to play PS2.
@hellraider
This generation you will lose PS3 games so... and you can buy a B/C PS3 for 350 dolars on ebay, maybe a little more

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







