Darth Tigris said:
Can't speak for others, but I think that Sony coming up with Kinect instead of MS actually would've made more sense considering their history with the EyeToy and PS Eye. The reality that MS took their basic idea and significantly enhanced it into Kinect (which, is a big success even early on) while Sony gave up on the camera path they were on and simply enhanced Nintendo's strategy is what doesn't make sense to me. But maybe it really was a software solution and sheer force of will. I remember MS had a motion controller on the PC and it did nothing and they dropped it but Nintendo wanted to make it work and DID. Plus technology that might not be workable 4 years ago CAN work now (remember initial polygonal efforts?). This article only proves that Sony's engineers couldn't or wouldn't solve the 3D camera limitations and MS (so far) has. |
Significantly I think not, the fact that it wasn't a significant hardware advantage is the main reason Sony passed it up, and frankly the only reason it seems(seriously doubt they'll break even even if they sell 5 mil by the end of the year) to be a commercial success is because of how much MS is advertising and hyping it, if Sony came out with kinect with the exact same games kinect has now with the hype and advertising they have for move it would have been received FAR more poorly







