binary solo said:
I suspect PS3 fans would be singing the praises of highly advanced controllerless gaming with its whole new vista of potential and dissing the Xbox dildo. And the Xbox fans would be celebrating the superior precision, responsiveness and feedback afforded by the hand-held motion device, while dissing the new PS camera as already tried and failed technology with only a slight improvement and no real application for hardcore games. End of the day in the console wars it's got nothing to do with the best technology, it all about which technology your side is using, and who is selling the most. It was an interesting read. I suspect in 2002 the 3D technology was a bit limited and the ball on a stick was a more cost effective way to go. I think Sony made a call to switch directions, and then invested in going that direction, at some stage there was a point of no return where ditching the ball on a stick and returning to a controllerless 3D camera concept was not a viable option for this generation, perhaps in part because of the massive losses Sony suffered in the early part of this generation. So even with a better 3D technology Sony were too far down the ball on a stick solution that they had to see it through to completion. Seems like Anton still thinks the current 3D camera tech is too limiting and is only willing to go back to it after another generational improvement on the technology. But he's clearly indicated an interest in re-opening up research when the tech is at the level they want it to be. Interesting times ahead. |
I REALLY DON'T SEE SONY GOING BACK IN THE 3D CAMERA DIRECTION AGAIN AFTER SEEING THAT PATENT LEAK WHICH ALLOWS FULL BODY TRACKING WITH A MOTION CONTROLLER USING A ULTRASONIC TRANSMITTOR...
it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE
The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1







