| jhuff394 said: this game looks lifelike on 1080p and thats all i can ask for..... that being said... unless SONY'S FIRST PARTY DELEVOPERS LIKE NAUGHTY DOG OR SANTA MONICA develop it..... the ps3's rediculous cpu power wont be utitlized properly.... the one question i have is why an RSX... combine a cell with the 360 gpu and you got a console that wont be touched for years.... cell/RSX > Xenos/Xenon But not by much.. cell/Xenon > many pcs... but obviously not all of em.. |
The Cell is hardly a great CPU for games, and its one that is now half a decade old. Sony had a fun little experiment, but their dream of derivative CPUS in just about everything under the sun never panned out, let alone their pie in the sky idea of distributed computing. On top of that they did a bad job of predicting where GPUs were headed, especially in terms of raw power. But they did see the GPGPU trend popping up, and you have to give them credit for that - even though there entry into the market failed.
Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?
ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all.
"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away"
