| theprof00 said: yep and I disagree with them and husky and any other commentators on the subject. And also, I will agree with you that vlad is wrong. :P. @Vlad, the problem with sc1 is that micro was enough to win the game. You didn't need macro. Macro is more important in sc2, which I think is good. But there is still a lot of micro'ing, it's just not as overpowered anymore. |
But you see, I was talking about what is called micro and macro, not what I define, or what you define, of course that in your opinion I will be wrong about defining these terms, because you treat them differently than any other... person in this world :P
I won't argue about semantics though, you can keep calling strategy macro, and I will call control on the macro level macro, with unit control on the micro level micro.
And anyway, i'm RageBot, 988, i'm on the EU server though.
Bet with Dr.A.Peter.Nintendo that Super Mario Galaxy 2 won't sell 15 million copies up to six months after it's release, the winner will get Avatar control for a week and signature control for a month.
