Gran Turismo 5 CRITIC REVIEWS & Metacritic Watch Thread!

[lestatdark]

Aldro said:

lestatdark said:

Aldro said:

lestatdark said:

Aldro said:

Gamereactor are bashing the hell out of GT5. For instance, they are making comparisons between Forza 3 & GT5. Where GT5 won by "a hair straw" WTF...

 

Now they did one on GT5 vs Shift.

 

And on top of that, they're writing in a way like =
"We put EA's Semi-simulator against Sony's eternity project"

Why not just say a simulator? They must really hate it.

And some people send questions for them to answer and one of them said :
"What good simulators are there on PS3?"

and the answer from the reviewer who gave it a 7 said :
"Need for Speed Shift is better than GT5." and more yada yada yada.

 

Everyone else is claiming its the best simulator so what the fuck.

I've got nothing against the opinion of Gamereactor, but to call Need for Speed Shift a simulator, I think they better redefine what a simulator means for them.

so what the fuck :( evil bitchez.

A second opinion on the review on GR was 5/10. 5!!!! Now seriously, this game IS NOT BAD. Infact, its very darn good. BUT 5?!

They are basically claiming GT5 of being the worst.. racing game ever. Really?.. jesus.

Well, if by their definition, a simulator should equal to arcade racing in all of it's aspects, then that should explain why they scored GT5 that way.

It's a crappy standard with some very invalid evaluation parameters though, since that means that GT5 would never do well in their eyes, because it's the very antithesis of arcade racers.

The guy says you can become better at driving in real if you play Forza 3 :(

Me no likes the xbox success.

Well, I enjoyed Forza 3 a lot, I almost completed it 100%, but GT5 is the better simulation experience to me.

I'm eagerly awaiting what InsideSimsRacing is going to say about GT5. Those guys are the best, in terms of professionalism and know-how, when it comes to racing simulators, and usually their views are spot on with my views.