lestatdark said:
Aldro said:
lestatdark said:
Aldro said:
Gamereactor are bashing the hell out of GT5. For instance, they are making comparisons between Forza 3 & GT5. Where GT5 won by "a hair straw" WTF...
Now they did one on GT5 vs Shift.
And on top of that, they're writing in a way like =
"We put EA's Semi-simulator against Sony's eternity project"
Why not just say a simulator? They must really hate it.
And some people send questions for them to answer and one of them said :
"What good simulators are there on PS3?"
and the answer from the reviewer who gave it a 7 said :
"Need for Speed Shift is better than GT5." and more yada yada yada.
Everyone else is claiming its the best simulator so what the fuck.
|
I've got nothing against the opinion of Gamereactor, but to call Need for Speed Shift a simulator, I think they better redefine what a simulator means for them.
|
so what the fuck :( evil bitchez.
A second opinion on the review on GR was 5/10. 5!!!! Now seriously, this game IS NOT BAD. Infact, its very darn good. BUT 5?!
They are basically claiming GT5 of being the worst.. racing game ever. Really?.. jesus.
|
Well, if by their definition, a simulator should equal to arcade racing in all of it's aspects, then that should explain why they scored GT5 that way.
It's a crappy standard with some very invalid evaluation parameters though, since that means that GT5 would never do well in their eyes, because it's the very antithesis of arcade racers.
|
The guy says you can become better at driving in real if you play Forza 3 :(
Me no likes the xbox success.
