Blizzard has fallen

[RageBot]

theprof00 said:

RageBot said:

Okay, so let me explain something to you.

I was at the top of my division in platinum, and i'm nothing but an okay player.

You seem to assume that rankings really matter, but they don't, the difference between you/me, and someone who is actually a top player (as in, goung to tournemants etc) is so big, that if we play them, we will never win, maybe once out of 100 tries.

And no, other than the fact that it is technicallty easier, the gameplay is pretty much the same between the two games, maybe even more difficult in SC2 because of different macro options that you need to keep on using (Chrono Boost with Toss, MULE with Terran, Spawn Larva/Spread Creep with Zerg)

first of all, boost,mule,and queen are MICRO not macro. Macro is what units do you build. Macro is overall strategy. Micro is focus firing, active battling, training units, using abilities etc etc. 

second of all, you said "was in platinum". Right? What are you now?

And I'm in upper gold, and it's pretty stiff competition here.

FYI: If you were platinum at release then that doesn't say much. It takes many months before all the ranks get accurate population density. Also, placing platinum right out of the placement matches also says nothing.

No, boost, mule and queen are macro because they are all economy, and have nothing to do with unit control during battles, they are also things that you need to constantly remember to do.

When I finished my placement matches I was in gold with 3-2 ratio, now, I am still in platinum, after I got to 1st in my division three weeks ago i've quit playing because there are other games i'd like to play and I rather watch Pro gamers play the game than play myself.

I like how you seem to diss my skills, especially based on how you seem to have no understandings of the basic concepts of micro and macro.