By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
fighter said:
CGI-Quality said:
fighter said:
CGI-Quality said:
fighter said:
CGI-Quality said:

I haven't seen it, but from what I gather, your sentiments aren't followed throughout. I'll have the game here in an hour or so, so I can judge it then. But for now, even reviews (most of them at least) haven't had too many bad things to say about the visuals.

Btw, where are the screenshots?

And mentioning the PC shows a bit of the problem right there.


Forget sentiments, just look at the facts :

IGN RATINGS FOR GRAN TURISMO 5 (PS3)

 

GN RATINGS FOR GRAN TURISMO 5 (PS3)

 

RatingDescription
out of 10 Click here for ratings guide
7.0 Presentation
A cumbersome front-end and minimal, overlong loading screens hinder it, as do a series of other strange design choices.
9.0 Graphics
It's moments of sheer beauty ultimately outweigh the uglier ones, though sadly they don't quite outnumber them.
8.0 Sound
The visuals aren't met by the audio, and the engine notes lack grunt. The less said about the soundtrack the better.
9.0 Gameplay
For all its missteps in the single player mode it's still an unrivalled driving experience - and that's where it really counts.
9.0 Lasting Appeal
There's certainly not a paucity of content, and if any future patches can help streamline the online it could have serious legs.
8.5
OVERALL
Great
(out of 10)

 

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/113/1136103p3.html

I do believe I put MOST not ALL. Reading comprehension didn't work here .

Can't you ever admit you're wrong ?

Early metascores are almost systematically better in the earlier reviews than in the following. Very few sites as IGN have the "balls" to be frank as soon as the embargo is lifted.

You've spent too much time on gaming websites not to know that, tss tss

Explain how I was wrong?

I don't care for who has "balls" or not. The point is, most sites haven't had many bad things to say about it's graphics.

And you love to tell people what they should/shouldn't be or what they do, yet you have a track record on this site for causing trouble and adding nothing meaningful to any discussion. What's even better, you're defending a guy who hasn't even played the game, but places an absolute sentiment on it's visuals.

Personally, I'm willing to take the word of people like Scoobes, Kowenicki, and Ajescent. They have it and have been fair in their impressions.


Are you admitting something more Freudian ?

This is why I don't usually care to debate with you and likely won't in the future. You never keep on topic and always have some sly remark to put in place of an, already, flimsy argument.

At least I know my side remained consistent and you couldn't show me where I was wrong. So on that note, there's nothing more to see here.


Calm down and smile a little will you ? Just don't go out of proportion again. All I'm saying is this game has been confirmed as nothing exceptional graphically. The other qualities of this game are also debatable but it's another story/topic.

And if i've hurt your feeling I deeply apologize.