| fps_d0minat0r said: the criteria reviews are using is too harsh, maybe because of the long development time. if we apply the same review framework to other games, they will be lucky to score a 3/10. for example i read a review which said the damage hardly moves a few polygons. apply that to call of duty: grenade blows up near wall. wall goes black, no damage what so ever. FAIL another example, the standard cars dont look great. apply that to GTA4: pedestrians look fake and ugly. FAIL another example, there are only 200 premium cars apply that to most racing games: there are not even 200 cars in total, FAIL another example, some cars are the same with few changes apply that to mario, 20% of the game was copy and pasted, 50% had a few changes. FAIL. its the inconsistency in the review criteria which doesnt make be believe it anymore. |
applied with your logic. GT5 is a fail because it has cars since all previous GT games have cars too! I'm not sure I understand your logic.
PD promised features that they didn't deliver and people can not complain about it?
MikeB predicts that the PS3 will sell about 140 million units by the end of 2016 and triple the amount of 360s in the long run.
