Kasz216 said:
SamuelRSmith said:
Gnizmo said:
SamuelRSmith said:
I think the fact that it doesn't have a very high chance of being successful is what is preventing this from happening.
|
Have you seen the security at airports in the USA? I have. A fully armed dozen people out for blood would make it through fine. Especially with a handy number of body shields running around panicked out of their mind. Keep in mind that people keeping the peace would have to care a great deal about civilian casualties.
|
Yeah, I've seen the security at airports in the US, seems pretty tight. Do you realise how long it would take for terrorists to "shoot their way" to the nearest plane? Longer than the amount of time it takes for Emergency Response Units to reach the scene, I'm sure.
EDIT: Oh, and don't get me wrong, I voted "no" on the poll, I am very much against body scanners and the like, I just don't think your "what if" scenario is likely.
|
Why would anyone bother to shoo their way to a plane anyway? A dozen fully armed people could probably do more damage as is, then trying to attempt another 9/11 style attack.
That's why the most recent terrorist information has been about gathering people in groups of 6 and arming them to just gun people down until taken down by police.
|
I have no idea why they would.
