By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake said:
Kasz216 said:

Except... you didn't?

You brought up two completely opposite cases for two different reasons.


It's like saying someone who says "Obama should die the liberal prick" would could be made by a Liberal, because you found an internet comment that said "Bush should die that facist prick!"

 

On one case we have "He should kill himself so my taxes are cheaper."

A clear mark of a sociopath.  He wants someone to die so his taxes can be cheaper.  He wants someone to die... for his own benefit.  He specifically states a sociopathic reason.

Your counterguement is

"Gays should die, because got hates them."

What?  You are flailing around without making a point here... it's exactly like your poor sociopath/psychopath arguement.

You're trying to twist my words (as I've noticed you tend to do).

YOU: The people who made those comments against Ricahrd are socially liberal atheist sociopaths.

ME: You have no proof that they're any of those things. In my country people make such comments all the time regarding several groups (gays, gypsies, politicians, atheists), and those people aren't atheists, socially liberal, nor (by your definition) sociopaths.

You actually can't make such as statement (like you did) without giving proof. By reading a comment you can make out that a person is a socially liberal atheist sociopath? What makes you think that the people who made those comments didn't think that by people liek Richard killing theirselves all of society would profit (case in which they no longer qualify as sociopaths)? I'm very sure many people could think like that.

Stop making stuff up trying to sound smart and give soem actual proof for your statements!


Because he didn't say that? 

He said "He should kill himself so my taxes were lower."

He didnd't say "He should kill himself so everyones taxes are lower."

or

"He should kill himself so the deficit is lower."

or

any other number of reasons.


He said "He should die.  So I can have it better."


Pretty cut and dry there.  Though I bet if you just up and went to that guys house he'd end up being embarresed about what he wrote.

 

A non sociopatic comment would be like this one... but without you know wanting someone to die

"this pretty much sums up what is wrong with this country, when a whinney baby like this complains about his government handout finally ending. It is obvious the the writer is a big time liberal, when he whines about a senator trying to rein in debt that we can't afford to accumulate. Unemployment would drop if the Obamanator would slash taxes instead of raising them and give small companies the reason and confidence to hire more workers. The nanny state exists in Europe, which is why their economies are stagnant. How about incouraging people to work rather than encouraging them to collect? Oh I forgot, in the liberal world workers have responsiblities and those that don't want to work only have rights."

or

"As someone who is unemployed I certainly do not share the views of Mr. Hutnick. Should congress decide to extend unemployment benefits ,the money must come from other sources rather than piling on more debt. It certainly is no great mystery why this moron is out of work. He may may be better off living with my parents (they have been dead for thirty years)"