sapphi_snake said:
Nope, the point of this conversation was that the people who made those comments (the one directed at Richard) were not necessarily socially liberal atheists (and I gave you an example of people who make such comments and are certainly not socially liberal, nor are atheists - religion being one of the driving points for their ideeas taht certain people should die). You made an unfounded claim (that those people were social liberal atheists sociopaths), and I confronted you about it. You can try to spin it all you want, but there's no way you can proove that the people who made those comments are social liberals, atheists, or even sociopaths. And FTR thinking that certain people should die (like people who live off wealfare) isn't necessarily an immoral stance, as morals are subjective. An economic conservative may think it's perfectly "moral" for someone leaving off wealfare (which they probably view as a leach) to be killed and stop wasting the money he pays on taxes. And his religious affiliation may not matter (most people I know who support the death penalty are not atheists for example). |
Except... you didn't?
You brought up two completely opposite cases for two different reasons.
It's like saying someone who says "Obama should die the liberal prick" would could be made by a Liberal, because you found an internet comment that said "Bush should die that facist prick!"
On one case we have "He should kill himself so my taxes are cheaper."
A clear mark of a sociopath. He wants someone to die so his taxes can be cheaper. He wants someone to die... for his own benefit. He specifically states a sociopathic reason.
Your counterguement is
"Gays should die, because got hates them."
What? You are flailing around without making a point here... it's exactly like your poor sociopath/psychopath arguement. The person who told richard to die specifically said why he wanted him to die and that reason was sociopathic in nautre.








