Gnizmo said:
Secure in what way? The threat that caused this would not have been detected. You have just objected to a less invasive, and more effective method. So where is the line? What precisely is considered a fair trade-off security for liberty wise? |
Secure in that every passenger and attendant had a visual check in any are they could conceal anything. The visuals are off-site and therefor not embarrassing as a physical pat down or having to remove clothing. No one is touching my wife or kids, yet we have all been 'searched'. That, to me, is a fair trade-off for better security. Its no different than having nurses and doctors all up your business at a hospital, in fact its better as the people 'viewing' the horribly poor quality image are not even there.