Gnizmo on 22 November 2010
| superchunk said: Which is why some massive firing with massive fine needs to be associated to fix. Its a simple fix and all that is really necessary. Still, I'm ok with these as it provides a far more secure setup and far less invasive than a real pat down/search. |
Secure in what way? The threat that caused this would not have been detected. You have just objected to a less invasive, and more effective method. So where is the line? What precisely is considered a fair trade-off security for liberty wise?
