So The Fight: Lights Out has 47 Metascore. IGN is still wrong?

[thismeintiel]

alfredofroylan said:

thismeintiel said:

So, you spent all of 3 matches with the game and didn't reach the matches where the opponents get faster and harder, so the game is still slow?  Though, in all honesty, you probably spent more time with it then the guy from IGN.    Maybe the game isn't to your liking, but I would also hope you wouldn't just label it a "horrible game" like some others. 

I also don't like to be labeled as a proponent of bum or street fighting.  I mean you do realise that this is only a game, right?  It would be like saying people who love gory FPS's want to go out and shoot people, or support those who do.

The fights were hard but not particulary fast, proably because I like Street Fighter and BlazBlue way more so I found The Fight slower than these titles. Yes I know it's a game but nothing in the presentation or the game reinforces that idea, even in FPS there're things that help to keep the game separated from real life like being attacked by aliens or regenerating your heal easily but The Fight has nothing I'm not going to say that this title is bad it's simply that I'm not the audience but still I feel like I waste my time playing this.

Well, I doubt the fights are as fast or hectic as Blazblue, but the opponents do get much quicker then the first 3-5 guys you fight.  Which is why you have to level yourself to be any good against them.  As for the bolded, I don't see why I need to be reinforced in the idea that I'm playing a game.  I mean I did buy the game for the PS3, put a game disc in, and am controlling a character using glowing balls.  So, I don't think I really need to be reminded while I'm playing that it's a game.  Anyway, I'm just glad you admit that might not be for you, but that doesn't make it "shit."