By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Booh! on 21 November 2010
Edit Thread
Mr.Metralha said:
Lafiel said:
Mr.Metralha said:

And for gaming press.

This game is only good to the ps3 crowd and shitty biased websites.

The "ps3 crowd" huh? Depending on your definition of that (bullshit)term it could be 41plus million people, which are probably a better indicator than 18 reviewers, lol.BTW as this game is PS3 only I think it's most important objective is to be "good to the PS3 crowd", heh.

 

Why is it so important to you that all people agree that this is "a bad game" huh?

I think shit like postal and rape simulators are bad games, but a fighting game that might or might not work as well as it should in no way is a "bad" game to me, just an enjoyable or not enjoyable one.

Personally I've enjoyed in the past some shovelware with broken controls too. Like I said above, and twestern elaborated on that, it doesn't make it a good game, we're just enjoying crap.

 

 

Why are you always trying to twist someone else's words?  He did say that "a bad game" is (plain speaking) a game of bad taste, like postal, all the other games can be enjoyable or not enjoyable (not good or bad). The fact that you do not understand is that The Fight is a good (enjoyable) fight-simulator/fitness game, while it is a bad (not anjoyable) arcade-like fighting game, but that's not its fault: it wasn't meant to be an arcade-like fighting game. All the gripes against some reviews are just due to this fact, it is not an action game, it is a simulator/fitness game. It is not shovelware (ie: a poorly realized game based on a popular genre), it is a niche game (ie: a game designed for a restricted crowd). By your standards MS flight simulator would be a bad game with bad controls, because the airplane is very difficult to control and you can't shoot.