Mr.Metralha said:
I'm talking about the websites that don't qualify for metacritic and are not reliable at all and people keep linking them and random fanboys on youtube. I can also have a shitty biased website, or a youtube account and review a trahsy game and say it is the holy grail. Yes, you fail. |
Only one website linked (iWaggle), no hype from PS fanboys (Playstation Lifestyle gave it a 20) and just a few gameplay videos (gameplay videos, not random fanboys): what are you babbling about?
The problem with reviewers is that they are always biased (a fps-lover would give a low score to an RTS and vice-versa) and that their bias are determined by trends. An uber-example? Just Dance!
Just Dance sits at 49 on metacritic (pretty bad, uh?), but it sold millions (maybe it wasn't so bad afterall), so now the same guys who gave 20's and 30's to Just Dance are rating Just Dance 2 with 70's and 80's (major offender: IGN with a 20 for Just Dance and an 80 for Just Dance 2). Since The Fight is a new type of game (probably the first 1:1 controls, no gesture based fighting game), it's clear that many reviewers are biased toward it: they don't dare to appreciate a game, that they don't know if people like.







