So The Fight: Lights Out has 47 Metascore. IGN is still wrong?

[M.U.G.E.N]

Mr.Metralha said:

Booh! said:

Mr.Metralha said:

I wonder why only PS3 owners and biased websites/blogs dedicated to PS3 that don't even qualify to metacritic such as iWaggle, are the only ones glorifying this game.

 

Metascore is down again, to 48, based on 18 reviews.

 

 

Try again, the highest scores are from indipendent publications: Eurogamer 80, TheSixthAxis 70, Gaming Age 67, Game Informer 65, while the lowest score is from Playstation Lifestyle 20 (IGN is now second lowest). iWaggle is not even in metacritic.

Probably you confused The Fight with some kinect games: Fighters Uncaged (meta: 32, highest scores: Mondo Xbox 75, Official Xbox Magazine 60), Adrenalin Misfits (meta: 48, highest score: MS Xbox World 70), Sonic Free Riders (meta: 49, highest scores: MS Xbox World 75, Official Xbox Magazine 75, IGN 75), Kinect Joyride (meta: 53, highest scores: MS XBbox World 75).

Fail?

 

I'm talking about the websites that don't qualify for metacritic and are not reliable at all and people keep linking them and random fanboys on youtube.

I can also have a shitty biased website, or a youtube account and review a trahsy game and say it is the holy grail.

Yes, you fail.

You need to realize that fans won't make such threads/reviews for ANY game...if not we would have seen threads for KungFu Rider way more and way before than this.

People are genuinly liking the game, simple as that. They feel some of the reviews have missed the point, so they say it. I see no problem with that. I don't see why this bugs you so much tho? If people like it they like it, they will play it and enjoy it...if you trust reviews from sites like IGN so much that's up to you..but criticizing non-stop and creating an issue out of a non-issue like this is just silly.

So let it be...and move along...