alekth on 18 November 2010
Read most of it, and frankly it seems a sentence with pretty hard restrictions. Maybe the images of hard to determine aged girls and child erotica suffice, but the two sentences dedicated to them are ridiculous compared to the detailed descriptions of the Simpsons kids, which while disturbing from a majority's point of view, aren't illegal.
Hopefully the evidence of him actually having possessed child porn and his own knowledge of the matter lead to him pleading guilty rather than intimidation of attempts to make full-fledged children out of completely unrealistic yellow cartoons.
Probably the most problematic point for me is him having been a middle school teacher, and I'm not even a parent.
